As a co-author,I haven't found any IPR applying to the draft. I support its
adoption.
Thanks.
Rong
发件人： Youjianjie
发送时间： 2015-06-27 09:44
收件人： Warren Kumari; [email protected];
[email protected]
主题： [OPSAWG]答复: Call for Adoption: draft-you-opsawg-capwap-separation-for-mp
Support as a co-author. I am not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.
Thanks,
Jianjie
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: Warren Kumari [mailto:[email protected]]
> 发送时间: 2015年6月25日 21:05
> 收件人: [email protected];
> [email protected]
> 主题: Call for Adoption: draft-you-opsawg-capwap-separation-for-mp
>
> Dear OpsAWG WG,
>
> The authors of draft-you-opsawg-capwap-separation-for-mp have asked for this
> draft to be considered for OpsAWG adoption. It was presented and discussed
> somewhat at IETF91 in Dallas - there was a question raised about similarities
> /
> overlap with draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel (which lies with the IESG).
> After some discussions we have decided that these documents complement
> each other, and so ask the WG to consider
> draft-you-opsawg-capwap-separation-for-mp for adoption.
>
> We would like 4-5 people to commit to editing and contributing to the
> document, and a similar number to commit to reviewing it.
>
> The draft is available here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-you-opsawg-capwap-separation-for-mp/
>
> Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption by
> OpsAWG,
> and comments to the list, clearly stating your view.
>
> Please also indicate if you are willing to contribute text, review, etc.
>
> This call for adoption ends Thu 09-Jul-2015.
>
> In addition, to satisfy RFC 6702 ("Promoting Compliance with Intellectual
> Property Rights (IPR)"):
> If you are personally aware of any IPR that applies to
> draft-you-opsawg-capwap-separation-for-mp, has this IPR been disclosed in
> compliance with IETF IPR rules? (See RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669, and
> 5378 for more details.)
>
>
> Thanks,
> Warren Kumari
> (as OpsAWG WG co-chair)
>
>
> --
> I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in
> the
> first place.
> This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret
> at
> having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants.
> ---maf
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
