Hello Warren

I am happy to review.
Also, being the lead author for the other draft mentioned here
(draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel)
I wanted to highlight that the draft needs to be progressed. We would like
to progress that draft. Specifically, can I request a WG last call.

Thanks

Rajesh

On 6/25/15, 6:04 AM, "OPSAWG on behalf of Warren Kumari"
<[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote:

>Dear OpsAWG WG,
>
>The authors of draft-you-opsawg-capwap-separation-for-mp have asked
>for this draft to be considered for OpsAWG adoption. It was presented
>and discussed somewhat at IETF91 in Dallas - there was a question
>raised about similarities / overlap with
>draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel (which lies with the IESG). After
>some discussions we have decided that these documents complement each
>other, and so ask the WG to consider
>draft-you-opsawg-capwap-separation-for-mp for adoption.
>
>We would like 4-5 people to commit to editing and contributing to the
>document, and a similar number to commit to reviewing it.
>
>The draft is available here:
>https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-you-opsawg-capwap-separation-for-mp
>/
>
>Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for
>adoption by OpsAWG,
>and comments to the list, clearly stating your view.
>
>Please also indicate if you are willing to contribute text, review, etc.
>
>This call for adoption ends Thu 09-Jul-2015.
>
>In addition, to satisfy RFC 6702 ("Promoting Compliance with
>Intellectual Property Rights (IPR)"):
>If you are personally aware of any IPR that applies to
>draft-you-opsawg-capwap-separation-for-mp, has this IPR been disclosed
>in compliance with IETF IPR rules? (See RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669, and
>5378 for more details.)
>
>
>Thanks,
>Warren Kumari
>(as OpsAWG WG co-chair)
>
>
>-- 
>I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
>idea in the first place.
>This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
>regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
>of pants.
>   ---maf
>
>_______________________________________________
>OPSAWG mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Reply via email to