We¹d be more than happy to split into two documents, the first being a tidy up of the current deployed protocol, but focussed towards the device admin use case as we discussed yesterday, and a second to deal with the crypto issue in a backwards-compatible way.
It sounds like this would help de-muddy some waters. On 12/02/2016 16:34, "OPSAWG on behalf of [email protected]" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: >Send OPSAWG mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > >To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg >or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > >You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > >When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >than "Re: Contents of OPSAWG digest..." > > >Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: TACACS+, a suggestion (Alan DeKok) > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Message: 1 >Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 11:34:40 -0500 >From: Alan DeKok <[email protected]> >To: Eliot Lear <[email protected]> >Cc: [email protected] >Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] TACACS+, a suggestion >Message-ID: <[email protected]> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > >> On Feb 12, 2016, at 10:46 AM, Eliot Lear <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi Stefan, >> >> Unless it is absolutely determined that the current work can't doesn't >>meet criteria for an IETF standard, I would be opposed to such an >>exercise. For one thing, we all have other things to do. For another, >>and as or more important, we would be denying the reality of the >>situation. > > The reality is that the TLS portion documented in the draft isn't >implemented anywhere. > > I find it telling that the work is important enough to push through the >WG, but not important enough that (as you say) the authors have other >things to do... and don't have the time to document old work as different >from new work. > > Alan DeKok. > > > >------------------------------ > >Subject: Digest Footer > >_______________________________________________ >OPSAWG mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg > > >------------------------------ > >End of OPSAWG Digest, Vol 105, Issue 92 >*************************************** _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
