On Feb 12, 2016, at 11:46 AM, Douglas Gash (dcmgash) <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> We¹d be more than happy to split into two documents, the first being a
> tidy up of the current deployed protocol, but focussed towards the device
> admin use case as we discussed yesterday, and a second to deal with the
> crypto issue in a backwards-compatible way.

  I believe that would be a positive way forward.

 Alan DeKok.

_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Reply via email to