Dear WG, Thanks to everyone who has been participating. It is refreshing to see this much passion and involvement in OpsAWG! We wanted to give this a bit of time to settle down, and also to see where this ended up.
We are going to do a series of steps to get as clear a view of the consensus of the WG about this document. This message is a explicit call for any known IPR. We will follow up with two other messages, each with a particular question - the reason for such formality is to try to untangle the many threads that erupted on the main list. Many of you have already expressed your opinion but can you please do so again in response to the forthcoming two messages so that the record is clear. We expect to determine the path forward in 2 weeks. Are you personally aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs? If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules? (See RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669, and 5378 for more details.) If you are a document author or listed contributor on this document, please reply to this email regardless of whether or not you are personally aware of any relevant IPR. Scott, Tianran and Warren
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
