Awesome, thank you.

W

On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 4:55 PM Andrej Ota <[email protected]> wrote:

> Below is the copy of the statement I received from Lol Grant.
>
> I believe we're now only one statement short and Thorsten should be back
> on-line on Monday at latest.
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Lol Grant <[email protected]>
> Date: Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 9:40 PM
> Subject: Re: IETF explicit call for IPR (related to TACACS+ IETF draft)
> To: Andrej Ota <[email protected]>
> Cc: David Carrel <[email protected]>, Thorsten Dahm <
> [email protected]>, "Gash, Douglas" <[email protected]>
>
>
> Hi Andrej,
>
> I know of no IPR related to TACACS+ and/or draft-grant-tacacs-02.
>
> Like Dave, I can speak only for myself, not for Cisco.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Lol Grant
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 5:55 PM, Andrej Ota <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> As a coauthor, I am not aware of any IPR related to the submitted
>> internet draft.
>>
>>
>> I did contact David and Lol and I will politely contact them again so
>> they can ack/nack as well.
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 5:38 PM, Warren Kumari <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> It is now almost 2 weeks since we asked for explicit IPR ACKs from all
>>> the authors.
>>>
>>> We have only received one.
>>>
>>> The document starts out with:
>>> "This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
>>> provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79"
>>>
>>> The explicit IPR check should simply be affirming the above.
>>>
>>> None of the authors should be "surprised" authors (2 of the authors have
>>> been very active, and it has been stated that David and Lol were contacted
>>> and checked).
>>>
>>> Frankly I'm starting to lose my sense of humor on this...
>>>
>>> W
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 12:15 PM Andrej Ota <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'm am double checking with in-house IPR legal.
>>>>
>>>> I have also sent off e-mails to David Carrel and Lol Grant so they know
>>>> about the call.
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 9:55 PM, Warren Kumari <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Dear WG (and specifically draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs authors),
>>>>>
>>>>> So far we have received an IPR acknowledgment from Douglas (
>>>>> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/FLI-7qqaD3AbArBKM42iNRiMxq8)
>>>>> , but are still missing it from the rest of the authors: Thorsten
>>>>> Dahm, Andrej Ota, David Carrel, Lol Grant.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please reply to this email regardless of whether or not you are
>>>>> personally aware of any relevant IPR...
>>>>>
>>>>> (I have just noticed that David and Lol do not have email addresses
>>>>> listed. Thorsten said that he spoke with them (recording from Prague)
>>>>> - please add their email addresses - they will need to ack the IPR, and
>>>>> also the AUTH48 if / when it happens...)
>>>>>
>>>>> W
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 7:46 AM Warren Kumari <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Dear WG,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks to everyone who has been participating. It is refreshing to
>>>>>> see this much passion and involvement in OpsAWG! We wanted to give this a
>>>>>> bit of time to settle down, and also to see where this ended up.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We are going to do a series of steps to get as clear a view of the
>>>>>> consensus of the WG about this document.   This message is a explicit 
>>>>>> call
>>>>>> for any known IPR.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We will follow up with two  other messages, each with a particular
>>>>>> question - the reason for such formality is to try to untangle the many
>>>>>> threads that erupted on the main list.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Many of you have already expressed your opinion but can you please do
>>>>>> so again in response to the forthcoming two messages so that the record 
>>>>>> is
>>>>>> clear.  We expect to determine the path forward in 2 weeks.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Are you personally aware of any IPR that applies to
>>>>>> draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs?  If so, has this IPR been disclosed in 
>>>>>> compliance
>>>>>> with IETF IPR rules?
>>>>>> (See RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669, and 5378 for more details.)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you are a document author or listed contributor on this document,
>>>>>> please reply to this email regardless of whether or not you are 
>>>>>> personally
>>>>>> aware of any relevant IPR.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Scott, Tianran and Warren
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> --
>>>> Andrej Ota
>>>>
>>>> Google Ireland Ltd., Google Docks, Barrow St., Dublin 4, Ireland
>>>> Registered in Dublin, Ireland -  Registration # 368047
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> --
>> Andrej Ota
>>
>> Google Ireland Ltd., Google Docks, Barrow St., Dublin 4, Ireland
>> Registered in Dublin, Ireland -  Registration # 368047
>>
>
>
>
> --
> --
> Andrej Ota
>
> Google Ireland Ltd., Google Docks, Barrow St., Dublin 4, Ireland
> Registered in Dublin, Ireland -  Registration # 368047
>
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Reply via email to