Dear OpsAWG, While we have lots of energy / interest, we'd appreciate some additional review of draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel ( https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel/ ).
This document has an interesting history - it completed WGLC in 2014-08-27 and was submitted to be published as an RFC on 2014-09-08. We then got draft-you-opsawg-capwap-separation-for-mp, which had some some significant similarities. We asked the ADs to hold alt-tunnel while we discussed what to do, and then finally asked the ADs / IESG to return it to the WG so that these two documents could be merged into one ( https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsawg/current/msg04071.html ). This document has already passed one WGLC (module the minor merging), and we are waiting on the authors to address some comments (e.g: https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsawg/current/msg04161.html ) and update the email addresses - once that happens we will do another WGLC -- but, while we are waiting, we'd appreciate any other review and feedback. W
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
