Hi, I have reviewed the previous versions of this document. I do not find significant changes in the content since. I believe that it’s ready for publication.
AFAIK the document was also reviewed by IEEE 802.11. I am copying the Dorothy Stanley who is the liaison manager, as I do not know if she is subscribed to the WG mail list. Regards, Dan From: OPSAWG [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Warren Kumari Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 12:31 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [OPSAWG] Review of "Alternate Tunnel Encapsulation for Data Frames in CAPWAP" - draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel Dear OpsAWG, While we have lots of energy / interest, we'd appreciate some additional review of draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__datatracker.ietf.org_doc_draft-2Dietf-2Dopsawg-2Dcapwap-2Dalt-2Dtunnel_&d=BQMFaQ&c=BFpWQw8bsuKpl1SgiZH64Q&r=I4dzGxR31OcNXCJfQzvlsiLQfucBXRucPvdrphpBsFA&m=YSTTTzZjDjD_fxRDbZTWgW6tBrwOadoMW7MP4RRFFdQ&s=ZuwP2TZyReJXmH8tHtt8Bg0SDGvmX2_un8TtmJU5sQI&e=> ). This document has an interesting history - it completed WGLC in 2014-08-27 and was submitted to be published as an RFC on 2014-09-08. We then got draft-you-opsawg-capwap-separation-for-mp, which had some some significant similarities. We asked the ADs to hold alt-tunnel while we discussed what to do, and then finally asked the ADs / IESG to return it to the WG so that these two documents could be merged into one ( https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsawg/current/msg04071.html<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mail-2Darchive_web_opsawg_current_msg04071.html&d=BQMFaQ&c=BFpWQw8bsuKpl1SgiZH64Q&r=I4dzGxR31OcNXCJfQzvlsiLQfucBXRucPvdrphpBsFA&m=YSTTTzZjDjD_fxRDbZTWgW6tBrwOadoMW7MP4RRFFdQ&s=59ocMkJDZW_0tPUy9QccyjIc81Yjqe5RhjgrCX0aG8M&e=> ). This document has already passed one WGLC (module the minor merging), and we are waiting on the authors to address some comments (e.g: https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsawg/current/msg04161.html<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mail-2Darchive_web_opsawg_current_msg04161.html&d=BQMFaQ&c=BFpWQw8bsuKpl1SgiZH64Q&r=I4dzGxR31OcNXCJfQzvlsiLQfucBXRucPvdrphpBsFA&m=YSTTTzZjDjD_fxRDbZTWgW6tBrwOadoMW7MP4RRFFdQ&s=Y24UHv4v54xg7rgWKHivf8xbeORWBYd3sjg6SJg1t2w&e=> ) and update the email addresses - once that happens we will do another WGLC -- but, while we are waiting, we'd appreciate any other review and feedback. W
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
