On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 7:46 PM Warren Kumari <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dear OpsAWG, > Thank you for your time and patience during this process. We note that we > now have all IPR ACKs. > > Based upon the responses we have decided on a path forward: > 1: Produce an informational document which documents the TACACS+ protocol > as it stands today (as best as we can). > > 2: After the WG has agreed to the above text, the plan is to produce a > new, Standards Track document which describes TACACS+ with the additions / > enhancements. Please noodle on the name for this new and improved protocol > - I'm partial to TACACS++, but that may be overly cute. > I may not have been sufficiently clear on #2 - the additions / enhancements will things like improving the security and necessary fixups. This is not an invitation to re-architect the TACACS protocol / turn it into something it ain't. W > > Thanks, > Scott, Tianran and Warren >
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
