On 3/1/16 9:20 AM, Warren Kumari wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 7:46 PM Warren Kumari <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Dear OpsAWG, > Thank you for your time and patience during this process. We note > that we now have all IPR ACKs. > > Based upon the responses we have decided on a path forward: > 1: Produce an informational document which documents the TACACS+ > protocol as it stands today (as best as we can). > > 2: After the WG has agreed to the above text, the plan is to produce > a new, Standards Track document which describes TACACS+ with the > additions / enhancements. Please noodle on the name for this new and > improved protocol - I'm partial to TACACS++, but that may be overly > cute. > > > I may not have been sufficiently clear on #2 - the additions / > enhancements will things like improving the security and necessary > fixups. This is not an invitation to re-architect the TACACS protocol / > turn it into something it ain't.
+1 > W > > > > Thanks, > Scott, Tianran and Warren > > > > _______________________________________________ > OPSAWG mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
