the paragraph i deleted before sending was
[ i do have sympathy for the motivation. heck, nick duffield suckered
me in the days when at&t had a research lab, but veered left into
trajectory sampling and the psamp stuff. ]
i missed your stuff; apologies. a cite would be good.
i do see the need for something in this space, for sure.
agree that security is critical; though i suspect the authors were more
oriented to intra-operator. we all know how that ends up.
> Given that he's punted on both security and transport it may be better
> to treat this as an information model or what-have-you rather than as
> a complete protocol.
would you like a saucer of yang milk? :)
randy
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
