Hi Alan,
Based on the information received from authors while tracking the
progress of the draft, they intend to publish a revised version covering
the comments received during the previous WGLC timeframe.
WG chairs are not for waving a stick at the WG in trying to tell what a
document needs to do to progress. While the WG document is formally
owned by the WG, it is for the authors to do the actual text editing
work and track and credit the changes in the text. Please initiate a
discussion with authors, ideally on the list, on how your comments were
or were not resolved. Quite many of past instances of such discussions
were happening before, and they eventually have moved the document
forward. Continuing with that discussion would be the right approach to
take.
Please also discuss the aspects of lack of credit for the text that you
have proposed. Contributed changes need to be credited, on what level -
that is for the document authors and editors to agree and decide.
Looking further, there will be a new WG last call coming out after the
revised version is posted. Usual WG LC discussion and commenting
procedures will be followed.
Thank you again for reviewing and improving the document.
Ignas
On 09/05/2017 18:41, Alan DeKok wrote:
I've taken a look at the latest draft, and have some serious concerns.
Specifically, large chunks of the Security Considerations sections appear to
have been lifted from my post to the list:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/tU2wBFIV4MkpKChWn6EvrqeZtXU
There are minor edits, but multiple sentences are copied word for word.
Sentences which don't occur in the -05 draft, but do appear in my review, and
subsequently are copied to the -06 draft with minor edits.
Multiple paragraphs are copied with only minor edits. The total amounts to
about a page of text.
While I appreciate that the document is improving, blatant copying of my
text without attribution is entirely inappropriate.
What are the chairs recommendations?
Alan DeKok.
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
