Let me express my support for Alan's statement below.
If a WG participant makes comments and posts them to the list, then it
is most appropriate that the authors (anyone in fact) respond and discuss
them on the list with suggestions for how to fix or improve the text.
Public discussion is preferred, but not mandatory (sometimes private discussion
between authors and the person(s) who see issues/concern can help resolve
things too).
But then when the private discussion comes to resolution/agreement, then it
seems best
to me to then also post that to the mailing list.
my 2 cents, Bert
Bert
On 10/05/2017 03:26, Alan DeKok wrote:
i.e. I have no idea what state the draft is in. After doing multiple
detailed reviews that largely get ignored, I'm not inclined to do more. It's
up to the authors to demonstrate that the comments have been addressed.
Authors have the next step to do at this time. Let's wait for the new revision
first.
It's also possible to respond publicly to my review.
Alan DeKok.
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
