Dear chairs, all, I support.
I reviewed an earlier version of the draft; most of my comments were kindly addressed by Adrian. I still have some cosmetic comments on the latest version (already sent to Adrian), but those are easy to fix. Cheers, Med > -----Message d'origine----- > De : OPSAWG [mailto:[email protected]] De la part de Tianran Zhou > Envoyé : lundi 5 juin 2017 03:55 > À : [email protected] > Cc : [email protected] > Objet : [OPSAWG] WG adoption poll for draft-wu-opsawg-service-model- > explained-06 > > Dear OPSAWG, > > In Seoul, we got enough interest and positive response on this service > models explained draft. > By the authors' request, this email starts a formal poll. The chairs would > like to know if the WG participants agree that the following document > should be adopted as a WG document in OPSAWG. > > Service Models Explained > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wu-opsawg-service-model-explained/ > > The adoption poll will take two weeks. Please let us know your opinion by > June 19. It would also be good to hear who is willing to review this > document. > > Since we already found that the majority of the f2f participants at our > IETF97 session like this idea, please do speak up now if you do not agree > or have serious objections (with explanation of course). > > Regards, > Tianran, OPSAWG Co-Chair > > _______________________________________________ > OPSAWG mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
