Hi All, Let's conclude this adoption call. >From the discussion in the mailing list, there are enough support for the >adoption of this document, and no objection. So we would like to adopt this I-D in OPSAWG. The authors, could you please update the document and resubmit to the WG.
Cheers, Tianran > -----Original Message----- > From: OPSAWG [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tianran Zhou > Sent: Monday, June 05, 2017 9:55 AM > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: [OPSAWG] WG adoption poll for > draft-wu-opsawg-service-model-explained-06 > > Dear OPSAWG, > > In Seoul, we got enough interest and positive response on this service models > explained draft. > By the authors' request, this email starts a formal poll. The chairs would > like to know if the WG participants agree that the following document should > be adopted as a WG document in OPSAWG. > > Service Models Explained > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wu-opsawg-service-model-explain > ed/ > > The adoption poll will take two weeks. Please let us know your opinion by > June 19. It would also be good to hear who is willing to review this document. > > Since we already found that the majority of the f2f participants at our > IETF97 session like this idea, please do speak up now if you do not agree > or have serious objections (with explanation of course). > > Regards, > Tianran, OPSAWG Co-Chair > > _______________________________________________ > OPSAWG mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
