Alexey Melnikov has entered the following ballot position for draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-17: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- This document is not perfect, but I found it to be generally useful. This version is much improved. When you talk about logging, maybe mentioning "protocol trace logging" or "PDU logging" as a useful tool for troubleshooting that can be provided by both client and server endpoints? DMARC (RFC 7489) should probably be mentioned in Section 5.1 where you mention ARF. _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
