On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 8:53 AM, Alexey Melnikov <[email protected]> wrote: > Alexey Melnikov has entered the following ballot position for > draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-17: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > This document is not perfect, but I found it to be generally useful. This > version is much improved. > > When you talk about logging, maybe mentioning "protocol trace logging" or "PDU > logging" as a useful tool for troubleshooting that can be provided by both > client and server endpoints? > > DMARC (RFC 7489) should probably be mentioned in Section 5.1 where you mention > ARF. >
Thanks for your helpful comments, Alexey. We will make these updates in a revision after the telechat. > -- Best regards, Kathleen _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
