On 3/20/18 06:19, Douglas Gash (dcmgash) wrote: > Hi Alan, > > Agreed. In the last cycle we looked to respond quickly to the comments, > however, hit a blocker on upload of the resulting doc. > > We will upload a new version with response to Joe’s comments from the 20 Feb > this week, and start cadence of interaction with group to get the security > section completed directly after.
Thank you, Douglas. Joe > > On 20/03/2018, 12:05, "Alan DeKok" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Mar 19, 2018, at 3:37 PM, Douglas Gash (dcmgash) <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Apologies for delay Alan, I have goofed with mail forwarding. > > > > We still have some work to do on the security section. I will check to > see which items we missed outside the security section, as I thought we had > them all covered. > > The point is to *engage* with the working group. Simply throwing a new > draft "over the wall" periodically does not inspire confidence. > > On top of that, the Security Considerations still contains substantial > amounts of my text, verbatim. With no acknowledgement that this is the case. > > It would be good for the authors to engage with the WG to demonstrate > that the document is ready. The document has been shown repeatedly to be not > ready for publication, with minimal engagement, feedback, or updates. > > Alan DeKok. > > > > _______________________________________________ > OPSAWG mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg > _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
