I, as a reader, still wonder about re-inventing the wheel - even with the 1st paragraph of 1.4 untouched.
Regards, Uri Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 18, 2018, at 14:12, Randy Presuhn <randy_pres...@alumni.stanford.edu> > wrote: > > Hi - > >> On 10/18/2018 12:58 AM, Tianran Zhou wrote: >> Well, the first paragraph in section 1.4 is neither clear nor necessary. >> I would suggest to remove this paragraph. Is that OK for you? > > The paragraph does seem clear, but is (in my opinion) incorrect. > However, it appears to be an integral part of the rationale for doing > the proposed work. Removing the paragraph would leave the reader > wondering "why re-invent the wheel?" > > Randy > > _______________________________________________ > OPSAWG mailing list > OPSAWG@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
