> On May 8, 2019, at 06:12, tom petch <[email protected]> wrote: > > Joe > > I am struck by > > "CCMIB Sean Turner 5 minutes > Sean wants no one to comment and no one commented" > > which seems consistent; no identifier for the whatever-it-is and so > no-one said anything!
Tom, to your point about an identifier, I uploaded a revision to the minutes that includes the link to the now-expired draft on which Sean’s presentation was based. As Warren said (and is stated in Sean’s slides), this was socialization of work so that it didn’t blindside the working group as it progresses to the IESG. I also added some additional minutes text to that effect. Joe > > Tom Petch > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Joe Clarke (jclarke)" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Saturday, May 04, 2019 10:52 PM > Subject: [OPSAWG] Minutes for 104 > > >> After a long delay I have posted the draft minutes from the IETF 104 > opsawg/Ops Area session. I took these from notes I did in Etherpad as > well as the video recording on YouTube. I missed one Huawei name at the > mic with the NTF draft, but I think I captured most everything else. >> >> Please review and Tianran or I know what we need to change. >> >> Thanks. >> >> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/104/materials/minutes-104-opsawg-00 >> >> Joe >> _______________________________________________ >> OPSAWG mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg > _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
