I have reviewed the material and the draft (latest).  As an individual, I 
support adoption of this draft as a WG item.

Joe

> On Jun 18, 2019, at 17:08, Warren Kumari <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Dear OpsAWG,
> 
> Here is a link to the slidedeck from IETF104 to refresh your memory -
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/104/materials/slides-104-opsawg-draft-wkumari-opsawg-sdi-01.pdf
> -- basically the entire document is summarized in 2 slides (slide 9,
> 10).
> If you'd prefer video -- https://youtu.be/a479Zohc5yg?t=1266
> 
> The main design criteria for this was to be as simple as possible, to
> make it trivial to implement and use. This is specifically designed to
> just augment existing auto-install functionality; there are much more
> ambitious and fully featured solutions (such as ANIMA and RFC 8572)
> available for those who can / want to use them.
> 
> I'd really appreciate your review and comment; it's short (if you
> ignore the ASCII art diagrams and example appendix and similar it is 7
> or 8 pages, and much of that is background).
> W
> 
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 2:39 AM Tianran Zhou <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi WG,
>> 
>> This document was presented in Prague, and got good feedback. The authors 
>> have addressed all the comments.
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wkumari-opsawg-sdi/
>> 
>> The chairs think this informational draft is easy to be implemented, and got 
>> good support.
>> 
>> This email starts a two weeks poll for adoption.
>> If you support adopting this document please say so, and please give an 
>> indication of why you think it is important. Also please say if you will be 
>> willing to review and help the draft.
>> If you do not support adopting this document as a starting point for work on 
>> this topic, please say why.
>> This poll will run until 2nd July.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Tianran & Joe
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> OPSAWG mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
> idea in the first place.
> This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
> regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
> of pants.
>   ---maf

_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Reply via email to