Dear Authors,
Thank for writing this draft and I understand the problem described in this
draft and believe it is real problem that needs to be solved.
I have a few comments on this draft:
1. Section 2, 2nd paragraph
The augmentations facilitate the use the resulting model in communications with
the transport orchestrator, also known as the MDSC (Multi-Domain Service
Coordinator) in the terminology of the framework for Abstraction and Control of
TE Networks (ACTN) defined in RFC 8453 [RFC8453].
is it better to use transport resource orchestrator or resource orchestrator
which is consistent with the first paragraph with the following text “…full
control of transport resources”
2.More complex deployment scenarios involving the coordination of different VPN
instances and different technologies to provide end-to-end VPN connectivity is
out of scope of this document, but is discussed in
[I-D.evenwu-opsawg-yang-composed-vpn].
We have implemented composed VPN, I am wondering whether there is any generic
solution which cover both case?
3. Section 3.2
I think whether PE is controller by the same management system or multiple
management systems, RT allocation is needed.
4. Section 3.2
Is RD synchronization issue implementation specific? If yes, it should be
spelled out explicitly
Thanks
Liu Chang
China Unicom
Email: [email protected]
Phone: +8618601102572
Tel: 010-68799999-7294
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
