Hi Haoyu, I have read the draft and think the iFIT is useful for operators to identify the issue quickly. You know that the silent failures are our biggest pain points, the precision location and network self-healing are our rigid demand. You say that iFIT is a closed-loop framework, in my opinion, it should include how to diagnose and restore the network, but I haven't seen either. Do I not understand or would you have explained it in other draft?
Beat Regard, Fengwei Qin 发件人: OPSAWG [mailto:[email protected]] 代表 Haoyu Song 发送时间: 2019年7月18日 02:06 收件人: [email protected]; [email protected] 主题: [OPSAWG] iFIT framework draft Hi all, We recently uploaded a newer version of the iFIT framework draft. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-song-opsawg-ifit-framework/ The purposes of the drafts are: 1. Clarify the terms and underlying techniques for data plane on-path telemetry 2. Present a framework that addresses the practical implementation and deployment issues 3. Identify the open issues and directions for related standard development Given the wide industry interests on adopting such techniques, we believe this informational draft is useful and In the scope of OPSAWG. Please review the draft and provide your opinions, suggestions, and comments. Thank you very much! Haoyu
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
