I actually think it's a pretty good summary, and delivers exactly what's promised in the title. OTOH I can also see that it's going to get bikeshedded to death, and will probably never be editable into a form where people won't complain about it no matter how many changes are made. Alternatively, it'll end up watered down to a point where no-one can complain any more but it won't say anything terribly useful by then.
Perhaps it could be published as is with a comment that it represents the opinions of the authors? Although given that it's Informational and not Standards-track or a BCP, that should be a given anyway. Peter.
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
