On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 5:44 PM Peter Gutmann <[email protected]> wrote:
> I actually think it's a pretty good summary, and delivers exactly what's > promised in the title. OTOH I can also see that it's going to get > bikeshedded > to death, and will probably never be editable into a form where people > won't > complain about it no matter how many changes are made. Alternatively, > it'll > end up watered down to a point where no-one can complain any more but it > won't > say anything terribly useful by then. > > Perhaps it could be published as is with a comment that it represents the > opinions of the authors? Although given that it's Informational and not > Standards-track or a BCP, that should be a given anyway. > Actually, no. Most IETF documents, even informational ones, bear a statement that they have IETF Consensus. See: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5741#section-3.2.1 -Ekr > Peter. > > > >
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
