Hi there authors and WG,

I'm now the responsible AD for this document.

There is *significant* history here, and it is going to take
substantial archeology to rebuild the state, etc.

Authors, there are currently 2 open DISUCSS positions - these
DISCUSSES were opened against version -13 of the document, and it is
now at version -16; it is your belief that this version addresses the
DISCUSSes? Have you had substantive discussions with the DISCUSS
holders (Roman and Alexey)?

I'd like to get this document moved along, and / or figure out what we
are doing with it.

W

-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
idea in the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
of pants.
   ---maf

_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Reply via email to