Will do.
On 27/01/2020, 15:42, "Joe Clarke (jclarke)" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Jan 27, 2020, at 10:31, Warren Kumari <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi there authors and WG,
>
> I'm now the responsible AD for this document.
>
> There is *significant* history here, and it is going to take
> substantial archeology to rebuild the state, etc.
>
> Authors, there are currently 2 open DISUCSS positions - these
> DISCUSSES were opened against version -13 of the document, and it is
> now at version -16; it is your belief that this version addresses the
> DISCUSSes? Have you had substantive discussions with the DISCUSS
> holders (Roman and Alexey)?
>
> I'd like to get this document moved along, and / or figure out what we
> are doing with it.
I’ve been communicating with the authors. They are working on a concerted
message to address the open DISCUSSes. I feel they have resolved them mostly
in content, but some additional conversation will need to be had to make sure
all points are addressed and understood.
Authors, please update us ASAP. It would be great to progress this for 107.
Joe
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
