On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 12:41 PM Joe Clarke (jclarke) <jcla...@cisco.com> wrote: > > With the publication of -02 of this draft, it seems to have reached > stability. There has been interest in both usage an implementation of this > draft expressed in the past, but discussion has been quiet lately. > > This email serves as a two-week start of a WG LC for this document. Please > [re-]read this draft and comment on its content as well as whether or not you > feel it’s ready. WG LC will conclude on February 18, 2020. > > Authors and contributors, please reply on-list as to whether or not you are > aware of any intellectual property attributed to this work. Reply that > either you are not aware of any such IP, or reply with the details of known > IP while also making sure you complete any IPR disclosures in data tracker.
I'm not aware of any IPR associated with this document. W > > Joe and Tianran -- I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the first place. This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants. ---maf _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
