A bit late, but we did get some good review from Gen Art and some opsawg members. This yielded a rev 03 and will certainly lead to an 04. With that, we will push this draft forward to the IESG after all pending comments are addressed.
Who in opsawg would be interested in serving as shepherd for this draft? @Tom Petch, I know you called out some prior art concern. Would you have an interest in shepherding? In general, I think the draft is (or very soon will be) in good shape. I would have liked to see a security directorate review, but no current reviews have called out serious security issues. Joe > On Feb 4, 2020, at 12:41, Joe Clarke (jclarke) <[email protected]> wrote: > > With the publication of -02 of this draft, it seems to have reached > stability. There has been interest in both usage an implementation of this > draft expressed in the past, but discussion has been quiet lately. > > This email serves as a two-week start of a WG LC for this document. Please > [re-]read this draft and comment on its content as well as whether or not you > feel it’s ready. WG LC will conclude on February 18, 2020. > > Authors and contributors, please reply on-list as to whether or not you are > aware of any intellectual property attributed to this work. Reply that > either you are not aware of any such IP, or reply with the details of known > IP while also making sure you complete any IPR disclosures in data tracker. > > Joe and Tianran > _______________________________________________ > OPSAWG mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
