> On Aug 13, 2020, at 08:49, Joe Clarke (jclarke) > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello, WG members. On the IETF 108 virtual meeting, Oscar presented the > status of the L3NM, L2NM, and the VPN common work. While this VPN common > YANG module started as an individual document (per the chairs’ request), the > L2NM and L3NM modules need to choose a direction for how to handle common > typedefs and groupings between them. > > On the virtual meeting we did a hum which indicated “Pianissimo” support. > Again, the hum system had some interesting rules, so this is not conclusive, > but seems to favor that this common module work should exist as its own, > standalone document that both L2NM and L3NM will consume. In this manner, > one would not need to import either L2NM or L3NM to make use of/extend these > common attributes.
Sorry, the hum was Forte (or strongest) for making this a standalone module that both L2NM and L3NM use. Pianissimo (light) was making it part of L3NM. Joe _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
