Hello WG,

I'm keen to see this progressing forward to come to standard reference for 
vendors and service providers active in the Netconf/Yang/IPFIX domain and in 
particular on the bulk data export.

I welcome the split in yang design to come to clear cut on the yang modeling 
specific to the IPFIX exporter and collector versus the modeling supporting the 
cache template configuration.

The IPFIX yang model gives good choice in options in which exporter and 
collector can relate to in which transport layer to use and have  
transport-layer security added (TLS for TCP). In an cloud based operational 
network nothing moves without properly addressing secure transport. Good to see 
options are given.

With a modular cut between PSAMP and bulk-data export implementation choices 
are given per specific yang module reducing the overhead of incorporate unused 
yang models with deviation statements (not-supported).

Best regards,
Philip


_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Reply via email to