All, Having seen some renewed discussion of this ID on the OPSAWG mailing list (and speaking as document shepherd) I'd like to give a brief reminder of some of the steps already taken.
Ref: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-boydseda-ipfix-psamp-bulk-data-yang-model/ - Yang Validation - 0 errors, 0 warnings. - Reviews - OPSDIR Last Call Review (of -02): Not Ready (partially completed) - YANGDOCTORS Last Call Review (of -02): Ready with Nits - GENART Last Call Review (of -02): Ready with Issues - OPSDIR Last Call Review (of -02): Not Ready (partially completed) - Document shepherd William Lupton - Shepherd write-up (last changed 2019-11-13) <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-boydseda-ipfix-psamp-bulk-data-yang-model/shepherdwriteup/> Here are a few quotes from the shepherd write-up (which predates some of the more recent discussion, e.g., re breaking up the draft or not obsoleting RFC 6728): - The shepherd feels that the document is mature, and that it does indeed (as promised) contain all the RFC 6728 material. However, RFC 6728 was quite an early YANG RFC, and the shepherd would appreciate feedback on whether a "modern" YANG RFC should put so much emphasis on UML diagrams and classes (it could instead refer more directly to YANG concepts) - idnits has been run and all fixes arising from examining its output have been applied - YANG has been validated using recent versions of pyang, yanger and yanglint. XML examples have been validated using yanglint Thanks, William
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
