I don’t think we’ve ever formally called for adoption of this work.  And this 
isn’t the first time it’s been discussed (last time one criticism was IETF 
wasn’t about ratifying file formats, but I think that’s debatable).  We’ll put 
out a call after IETF109 and see where the WG is now.

Joe

> On Nov 9, 2020, at 14:23, Eliot Lear <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> This is good work, it’s a format used everywhere.  We also need a registry 
> for option extensions that IANA could provide.  And we have some ideas as to 
> how to use that.
> 
> Eliot
> _______________________________________________
> OPSAWG mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Reply via email to