>> I don’t think we’ve ever formally called for adoption of this work.
>> And this isn’t the first time it’s been discussed (last time one
>> criticism was IETF wasn’t about ratifying file formats, but I think
>> that’s debatable). We’ll put out a call after IETF109 and see where the
>> WG is now.Michael Tuexen <[email protected]> wrote: > Great, I really appreciate it. I also! A related draft is draft-gharris-opsawg-pcap.txt, which is the legacy format. It would be an Information document. The WG might like to consider if they should be adopted as a pair. It would define an IANA Registry for LinkType, which is used in pcapng as well. Alternatively, the IANA Considerations for LinkType could be moved from the pcap to pcapng. -- Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
