Hi Tom, On 28.05.21 17:52, tom petch wrote:
<tp> Well-formed I-D should explain how they update what they claim to update. This one does, sort of, in the Introduction. What is missing is text such as Section.x.y of RFC8520 is updated to include the following paragraph "Those generating MUD files SHOULD use the owner-license [RFCxxxx] extension unless ...2
What the draft says:> Those generating MUD files SHOULD use this extension, and thus this extension updates RFC 8520.
Regarding the words, "extends" or "updates", I have no horse in that race. Eliot
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
