Michael Richardson <[email protected]> wrote:
    > I have reposted the PCAP and PCAP-NG documents.

    > Name:             draft-gharris-opsawg-pcap
    > Title:            PCAP Capture File Format
    > Html:           
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-gharris-opsawg-pcap-02.html
    > Diff:           
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-gharris-opsawg-pcap-02

This diff is mostly just about filling in missing LinkTypes.

    > Name:             draft-tuexen-opsawg-pcapng
    > Title:            PCAP Next Generation (pcapng) Capture File Format
    > Html:           
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-tuexen-opsawg-pcapng-03.html
    > Diff:           
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-tuexen-opsawg-pcapng-03

This diff is half format changes, and the rest are additions of new block
types.
Should systemd block type be in an IETF *standard*, or another document?
I'm open to splitting some of that up.

--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide




Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Reply via email to