Joe Clarke (jclarke) <[email protected]> wrote:
    >> Should systemd block type be in an IETF *standard*, or another document?
    >> I'm open to splitting some of that up.

    > As a contributor...

    > Given how systemd is prone to considerable change, I'd think it would be
    > best to leave that out.  That said, the pull request language in -03 has
    > me curious.  If someone were to raise a PR against this doc, that would

That sounds like an awesome comment to make in the context of WG Adoption
Call.  If only we were having one of those.

--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide




Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Reply via email to