Hi all, afaik, SPDX 2.2.1 exactly reflects ISO 5962:2021.
The specification can be found here: https://github.com/spdx/spdx-spec Viele GrΓΌΓe, Henk On 04.10.21 22:51, Michael Richardson wrote:
Henk Birkholz <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear OPSAWG members, > this starts a call for Working Group Adoption of >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-lear-opsawg-ol-01 > ending on Monday, October 18th. > As a reminder, this I-D describes an extension to MUD that allows MUD file > authors to specify ownership and licenses in the MUD files themselves. The > corresponding YANG augment defined can be used outside the scope of MUD as > well. I have read this version of the document and previous versions. I am happy to adopt it. I note that SPDX is now some ISO standard 5962:2021. At present, the ISO still seems to be charging for this document, despite having said they would not. I don't propose to change anything in the document to include "5962" in it. I do not believe that the ISO/IEC adheres to the IETF's open-stand.org principles. While spdx.org redirects to spdx.dev, it appears that: https://spdx.org/licenses/ and https://spdx.dev/licenses/ contain the same information, but with a different CSS. I prefer the one at spdx.org, but I imagine that it will not remain. -- Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IΓΈT consulting ) Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
