Hi Qin, On 26. Oct 2021, at 03:43, Qin Wu <[email protected]> wrote: > > I am not against this draft. I am just thinking whether Independent > submission stream process is a better choice for this document
Iโm not sure which โthis documentโ you are discussing here, as Michael asked about both pcap and pcapng. Letโs assume you are talking about pcap. > in the first round when WG and IESG have no change control to this work. I have no idea what a second round would be. The pcap format needs to be published only once. The pcap document *could* be an independent submission. However, the document will benefit from wide review, as it is documenting widely spread practice, which makes the WG process more useful. > Upon this work get published as RFC > (https://www.rfc-editor.org/about/independent/), bisdocument can go through > WG submission process, if my understanding is correct. No document here has to wait for any other document to be published. Grรผรe, Carsten > > -Qin > -----้ฎไปถๅไปถ----- > ๅไปถไบบ: Michael Richardson [mailto:[email protected]] > ๅ้ๆถ้ด: 2021ๅนด10ๆ26ๆฅ 0:28 > ๆถไปถไบบ: [email protected] > ๆ้: [email protected]; Toerless Eckert <[email protected]>; Qin Wu > <[email protected]>; Carsten Bormann <[email protected]>; > [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] > ไธป้ข: Re: [OPSAWG] ๐ WG Adoption Call for draft-gharris-opsawg-pcap-02 > > On 2021-10-20 12:40 p.m., Michael Richardson wrote: >> On 2021-10-04 4:00 p.m., Henk Birkholz wrote: >>> Dear OPSAWG members, >>> >>> this starts a call for Working Group Adoption of >>> >>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-gharris-opsawg-pcap-02 >>> >>> ending on Monday, October 18th. >> >> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/4Cvm_msdnORHMUY3kbyCV6dbG >> yI is a very long thread about adoption from November 2020. >> >> There were many suggestions at the time from many people on the CC. >> >> It would be great if you could comment on the current plan. >> > > A number of you spoke up last week about pcapng in this thread. > Can you clarify if your support was for the pcapng only document, or for both > pcap and pcapng? > _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
