Carsten Bormann <[email protected]> wrote:
    >> That's being done by the pcap document.
    >> (It could be done by a third document, but that seems wasteful)

    > It seems appropriate to have a third document.
    > I don’t see the waste, only process improvement.

I'm not convinced that the IESG review of the document won't take months.
But, if the WG would like to go that way, I will prepare the document.

--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>   . o O ( IPv6 IΓΈT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide




Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Reply via email to