Carsten Bormann <[email protected]> wrote: >> That's being done by the pcap document. >> (It could be done by a third document, but that seems wasteful)
> It seems appropriate to have a third document.
> I donβt see the waste, only process improvement.
I'm not convinced that the IESG review of the document won't take months.
But, if the WG would like to go that way, I will prepare the document.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IΓΈT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
