Hi Greg,

Thanks for the comments. STAMP referenced as RFC 8762 has been added as one of 
PM measurement protocol.
Please be aware this model is a network model and does not specifies the 
details of STAMP.
Please check whether rev-08 addresses your concerns:
  https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsawg-yang-vpn-service-pm-08

Thanks,
Bo
From: Greg Mirsky [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 4, 2022 4:54 AM
To: Adrian Farrel <[email protected]>
Cc: IETF IPPM WG <[email protected]>; opsawg <[email protected]>; 
[email protected]
Subject: Re: [ippm] Heads up on draft-ietf-opsawg-yang-vpn-service-pm

Hi Adrian,
thank you for bringing this work to my attention. I've read and shared my 
comments earlier. The authors responded promptly and we've worked together to 
address my comments. After reading the current version I have a question about 
the importance of identifying the particular active measurement protocol used 
to measure the reported performance metrics. If reporting the protocol used for 
the performance measurement is deemed essential to characterize the accuracy of 
the measurement method, then I would propose to consider several additions to 
the model:
·         adding STAMP described in RFCs 8762 and 8972 to the list of active 
measurement methods
·         adding Error Estimate for Session-Sender and 
Session-Reciever/Session-Reflector for OWAMP, TWAMP, and STAMP
Thank you for your kind consideration.

Regards,
Greg

On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 2:48 PM Adrian Farrel 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi,

I'm the document shepherd for draft-ietf-opsawg-yang-vpn-service-pm. It has
completed WG last call in the OPSAWG.

The work may be of interest to IPPM and you might want to watch out for the
IETF last call which will be along in due course.

But I'm sure that the authors would welcome any comments you have at any
time.

Best,
Adrian

_______________________________________________
ippm mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Reply via email to