Hi Bo, thank you for your quick response to my comment and clarification. The updates fully address my comments.
Regards, Greg On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 5:46 AM Wubo (lana) <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Greg, > > > > Thanks for the comments. STAMP referenced as RFC 8762 has been added as > one of PM measurement protocol. > > Please be aware this model is a network model and does not specifies the > details of STAMP. > > Please check whether rev-08 addresses your concerns: > > > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsawg-yang-vpn-service-pm-08 > > > > Thanks, > > Bo > > *From:* Greg Mirsky [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Wednesday, May 4, 2022 4:54 AM > *To:* Adrian Farrel <[email protected]> > *Cc:* IETF IPPM WG <[email protected]>; opsawg <[email protected]>; > [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [ippm] Heads up on draft-ietf-opsawg-yang-vpn-service-pm > > > > Hi Adrian, > > thank you for bringing this work to my attention. I've read and shared my > comments earlier. The authors responded promptly and we've worked together > to address my comments. After reading the current version I have a question > about the importance of identifying the particular active measurement > protocol used to measure the reported performance metrics. If reporting the > protocol used for the performance measurement is deemed essential to > characterize the accuracy of the measurement method, then I would propose > to consider several additions to the model: > > · adding STAMP described in RFCs 8762 and 8972 to the list of > active measurement methods > > · adding Error Estimate for Session-Sender and > Session-Reciever/Session-Reflector for OWAMP, TWAMP, and STAMP > > Thank you for your kind consideration. > > > > Regards, > > Greg > > > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 2:48 PM Adrian Farrel <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm the document shepherd for draft-ietf-opsawg-yang-vpn-service-pm. It has > completed WG last call in the OPSAWG. > > The work may be of interest to IPPM and you might want to watch out for the > IETF last call which will be along in due course. > > But I'm sure that the authors would welcome any comments you have at any > time. > > Best, > Adrian > > _______________________________________________ > ippm mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm > >
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
