Thanks to Marta for the nudge on this. The CfA window has lapsed, and I saw no responses on the list (double-checked the archives as I've been away). Therefore, it seems the WG does not wish to work on this. This work will not be adopted by opsawg at this time.
Joe On 5/17/22 12:21, Joe Clarke (jclarke) wrote: > As threatened at IETF 113, we want to hold a CfA for this updated (and > much simplified) version of the previous > draft-boydseda-ipfix-psamp-bulk-data-yang-model draft. This work was > presented at 113 and it has since gone through one revision based on an > initial review. > > I was hoping we'd get some other pre-adoption reviews, but now it's time > to make things official and request WG thinking on whether this draft > should proceed as a WG document. > > We will hold a CfA from now until May 31, 2022. Please review > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-arokiarajseda-ipfix-data-export-yang-model/ > and indicate whether you have interest in working on this (as well as > another other comments). > > Thanks. > > Joe > > _______________________________________________ > OPSAWG mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg > _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
