Thanks for the nudge, Marta. I've been away and when I got back I was thrown in the fire.
I've concluded the call for adoption. Unfortunately, there were no comments on the list, and thus the call has not passed. I'm including Rob (area director) in Cc as there was also prior discussion of this going forward as AD-sponsored. Joe On 6/9/22 14:22, Marta Seda wrote: Hello, I am one of the editor for draft-arokiarajseda-ipfix-data-export-yang-model. The last entry related to this draft noted that IETF wanted to hold a cfa (assume that acronym is “call for adoption”). The deadline for that vote (May 31st) has come and gone. Can the editors get notified of the results? Thanks. Regards Marta As threatened at IETF 113, we want to hold a CfA for this updated (and much simplified) version of the previous draft-boydseda-ipfix-psamp-bulk-data-yang-model draft. This work was presented at 113 and it has since gone through one revision based on an initial review. I was hoping we'd get some other pre-adoption reviews, but now it's time to make things official and request WG thinking on whether this draft should proceed as a WG document. We will hold a CfA from now until May 31, 2022. Please review https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-arokiarajseda-ipfix-data-export-yang-model/ and indicate whether you have interest in working on this (as well as another other comments). Thanks. Joe
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
