On Jun 30, 2022, at 3:09 PM, heasley <[email protected]> wrote: > Speaking for myself only; I might have misunderstood this point of Alan's > and will have to review that email. I think that the approach is > straight-forward; start tls, once established, start tacacs, tacacs, end > tacacs, end tls. How much easier could it be.
Yes. That's the hope. > We did specify a few TLS constraints, that Alan questioned. We're open to > discussing those details, but I think we need input from more tls experts > and believe this can occur after adoption. IIRC, that was our response at > the beginning of May when the composite draft was submitted. EMU spent a lot of time with TLS recently. I'm hoping that experience will help here. Alan DeKok. _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
