Hi Michael, Your request is received. I think this is good to discuss. What’s the slot you need for this?
Cheers, Tianran ________________________________ Sent from WeLink 发件人： Michael Richardson<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> 收件人： Tianran Zhou<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>;opsawg<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>;OpsAWG-Chairs<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> 主题： Re: [OPSAWG] Call for presentation//FW: IETF 115 Preliminary Agenda 时间： 2022-10-12 04:23:59 Tianran Zhou <[email protected]> wrote: > The IETF 115 preliminary agenda is posted. > The OPSAWG meeting is currently scheduled at 09:30-11:30 Wednesday Session I. > We open the call for presentation. > Please send over your request to the chairs. > And please arrange your travel if you are going to join the meeting on-site. I would like to talk about the MUD documents that have been lingering. Would the WG like to proceed with: 1. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-iot-dns-considerations/ -and/or- 2. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-acceptable-urls/ The second has less controversy, and it updates 8520 in an important way. I feel that both have had extensive review. The first has had a number of reviews that essentially question the entire RFC8520 process, how IoT device are deployed, and asks us to restart IoT deployment from scratch. All good ideas, but the barn doors have been open for a decade, and the horses are long gone. This document simply tries to keep the horses from jumping off cliffs. -- Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
