Tianran Zhou <[email protected]> wrote:
    > Your request is received. I think this is good to discuss.
    > What’s the slot you need for this?

Well, I would be happy to have 7+3 minutes to recap the comments on the
documents, and what the goals of the documents are, and what the problems are.

The documents are not new, have already been adopted, reviewed, but there
does not seem to be a path towards WGLC yet.


--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide




Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Reply via email to