Hi Qiufang, Daniele and all,
I also prefer option 1. to adopt draft-ietf-ccamp-network-inventory-yang-02 in IVY, since I agree on the clear separation between inventory and operational and topology data, and also the consistence with other established standards. At the same time, I second also other comment in the thread for the incorporation of the Software, License, and Virtual object inventory in it by reusing part of the work in draft-wzwb-opsawg-network-inventory-management-03. Best Regards Roberto Manzotti From: Inventory-yang <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Dieter Beller (Nokia) Sent: Monday, September 4, 2023 6:37 PM To: [email protected] Cc: opsawg <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [Inventory-yang] [CCAMP] [inventory-yang] poll for network inventory base model +1 Thanks, Dieter On 04-Sep-23 16:41, Gabriele Galimberti wrote: I agree with Jeff too. Best Regards, Gabriele Galimberti Via Melgacciata, 13 20813 – Bovisio Masciago (MB) Italy +39 3357481947 Da: CCAMP <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]> per conto di "JEAN-FRANCOIS BOUQUIER, Vodafone" <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]> Data: lunedì 4 settembre 2023, 16:14 A: "maqiufang (A)" <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]>, <mailto:[email protected]> "[email protected]" <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]> Cc: <mailto:[email protected]> "[email protected]" <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]>, opsawg <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]>, <mailto:[email protected]> "[email protected]" <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]> Oggetto: Re: [CCAMP] [inventory-yang] poll for network inventory base model Hi Qiufang, Daniele and all, My preference goes to option 1 to adopt draft-ietf-ccamp-network-inventory-yang-02 in IVY and evolve it to become the network inventory base model. Kind regards, Jeff C2 General De: Inventory-yang <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]> En nombre de maqiufang (A) Enviado el: lunes, 28 de agosto de 2023 8:22 Para: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> CC: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; opsawg <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]>; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Asunto: [Inventory-yang] [inventory-yang] poll for network inventory base model This is an external email. Do you know who has sent it? Can you be sure that any links and attachments contained within it are safe? If in any doubt, use the Report Message button in your Outlook client to report this mail. Hi Working Group, It’s now time to start considering how to move forward with the inventory base model. We have two different documents that could be used as a starting point for our work or, in case the working group believes none of them is “good enough”, we can start a brand new ID. In case the latter option is chosen, Daniele and I will write a -00 version including just the table of content and what we’d like to be covered in each section. The document will then be handed over to a pool of authors which will bring it till the WG adoption. Hence, we will have a 3 weeks polling starting today. We decided to make it a bit longer than usual because this time the working group is requested to review two drafts instead of one. This mail starts a 3 weeks polling, terminating on September 15th, where we would like the working group to express your preference among: 1. Adopt draft-ietf-ccamp-network-inventory-yang-02 in IVY and evolve it to become the network inventory base model 2. Adopt draft-wzwb-opsawg-network-inventory-management-03 in IVY and evolve it to become the network inventory base model 3. Start a brand new document from scratch as described above In the week after the closure of the polling (between September 18 and 25) we will have an IVY interim meeting to discuss the issues/concerns raised during the polling ( A separate mail will be sent). Thank you, Qiufang and Daniele
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
