I should have adjusted my boilerplate to say “these drafts”. I assume your “this draft” is applicable to all four?
Joe From: samier Barguil <[email protected]> Date: Monday, September 25, 2023 at 11:54 To: Joe Clarke (jclarke) <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>, mohamed.boucadair <[email protected]>, Richard Roberts <[email protected]>, Oscar González de Dios <[email protected]>, Wubo (lana) <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, Qin Wu <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work Hello all, No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft Regards, Samier On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 5:28 PM Joe Clarke (jclarke) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: This is a consolidated poll for the following drafts: · draft-boro-opsawg-teas-common-ac · draft-boro-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit · draft-boro-opsawg-ntw-attachment-circuit · draft-boro-opsawg-ac-lxsm-lxnm-glue Authors and contributors on the To: line, please respond on-list as to whether or not you are aware of any IPR that pertains to this work. Please state either: "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" or "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft" If you are aware of IPR, indicate whether or not this has been disclosed per IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3669, 5378, and 8179). Joe
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
