I have read this version and checked the difference to the prior version. It addressed specific issues I understood, it looks to address ambiguities in the encoding and representation of its structure which make it much more likely people can interoperate correctly.
I think overall this is a good revision. -George On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 2:59 PM Randy Bush <[email protected]> wrote: > > authors pushed latest revision of $ubject. would very much like some wg > members, or anyone actually. to have a look and comment before we decide > if it is time to ask for wglc. > > thavanceanks > randy > > _______________________________________________ > OPSAWG mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
